The U.S. Capitol at night (Image via Flickr Commons)
WASHINGTON — U.S. House Democrats have worked out key differences with the Trump administration over a massive trade deal, allowing both sides to declare a legislative victory on the same day the House unveiled articles of impeachment against the president.
If ratified, the deal would replace the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which took effect a quarter century ago. Proponents say the “new NAFTA” will grow the economy, support workers, protect the environment and create a more level playing field between the United States and Mexico and Canada.
“It’s a victory for America’s workers [and] one we take great pride in advancing,” U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said at a press conference Tuesday.
Nobody knows the importance of having a better trade agreement than we do in Northeastern Pennsylvania. I’m pleased that my colleagues have been able to work with the Trump administration to reach a stronger #USMCA for American workers. https://t.co/vY5q3TaPBb
— Matt Cartwright (@RepCartwright) December 10, 2019
Democrats regarded the Trump administration’s initial version of the deal as a non-starter because of language that they said would allow violations of labor and environmental standards to go unchecked and lead to higher prescription drug prices.
But Pelosi credited her Democratic colleagues for negotiating a new version with U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer that strengthens labor and environmental standards and enhances monitoring and inspection processes. It also removes “corporate gifts” to the pharmaceutical industry that would have harmed consumers, Democrats said.
The new version of the deal — known as the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) — is better than NAFTA and “infinitely better” than the original version, Pelosi said.
It also has the support of AFL-CIO head Richard Trumka, a champion of labor rights.
— AFL-CIO ✊ Pass the #PROAct (@AFLCIO) December 10, 2019
The deal is “far from perfect,” he said in a statement Tuesday. “But there is no denying that the trade rules in America will now be fairer because of our hard work and perseverance. Working people have created a new standard for future trade negotiations.”
President Donald Trump and leaders of Canada and Mexico signed the original version of the deal last fall and must sign off on the new language.
Pelosi expects the full House chamber to consider the USMCA this month, and Republican leaders in the U.S. Senate have been actively pushing for it.
Trump, who campaigned in 2016 on improving trade, cheered the deal Tuesday.
“America’s great USMCA Trade Bill is looking good,” he tweeted. “It will be the best and most important trade deal ever made by the USA.”
We’re one step closer to making #USMCA a reality. Let’s hold a vote and score major wins for ALL Americans.
✅ Increase of $2B in agriculture exports annually
✅ 176,000 new jobs
✅ Increased market opportunities pic.twitter.com/BDLLnoz7Im
— Glenn 'GT' Thompson (@CongressmanGT) December 10, 2019
If ratified, the USMCA would also give political cover to Democrats, who have been eager to show they can legislate while also pursuing an impeachment inquiry.
(2/2) USMCA will spur $68B in new economic growth across the U.S., and PA's economy will benefit immensely. Trade with Canada and Mexico supports more than 470K jobs in PA alone, and more than 42K jobs in PA depend on manufacturing exports to these countries.
— Congressman Dan Meuser (@RepMeuser) December 10, 2019
This is especially true for vulnerable Democrats in some of the country’s more conservative districts, who fear being charged with legislative inaction and an obsession with impeachment.
Pelosi dismissed those political calculations out of hand on Tuesday, saying: “Not anyone of us is important enough to hold up a trade agreement that is important for American workers because of any collateral benefit that might accrue to any one of us.”
Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.