The bill would suspend the nation’s borrowing limit through Jan. 1, 2025 and set caps on discretionary spending for two years. It would also make changes to work requirements on some federal safety net programs and overhaul aspects of the energy permitting process. The House approved the bill following a 314-117 vote.
All but two members of Pennsylvania’s 17-member House delegation voted for the bill. U.S. Reps. Scott Perry, R-10th District, and Summer Lee, D-12th District, cast ‘no’ ballots, according to an official House roll call.
While members of both political parties broadly backed the legislation, they each criticized the compromises negotiators made to broker an agreement.
North Carolina Rep. Patrick McHenry, one of the Republican negotiators who brokered the deal, said the bill was the product of a “long, laborious and tough” process.
The measure, he said, is the “most conservative spending package” he’s voted on during his time in Congress, though he noted it’s a product of divided government where the GOP controls the House while Democrats control the Senate and White House.
“This rates as one of the largest deficit reduction bills in American history and it will fundamentally change the spending trajectory here in Washington — with more work to do and more work ahead,” McHenry said.
Washington Democratic Rep. Suzan DelBene said that while the “deal is far from perfect” lawmakers “can’t let perfect be the enemy of the good when the stakes are this high.”
The agreement, she said, would shield veterans, senior citizens, law enforcement and schools from the more severe budget cuts that Republicans proposed in their original debt limit bill.
“This deal will protect American families and our economy from a devastating default on our nations’ bills in just five days,” DelBene said.
“Compromise means that no one gets everything they want, so we have a choice between a catastrophic outcome or a chance to move forward with a bipartisan compromise,” she added later.
New Jersey Democratic Rep. Bill Pascrell criticized Republicans for ruling out all changes to the tax code during negotiations and for rescinding some money to boost the Internal Revenue Service’s budget.
“We want to make sure everybody pays their fair share — what in God’s name is wrong with that,” Pascrell said.
If Congress doesn’t update the tax code, Pascrell said, lawmakers haven’t done their jobs.
The package would set federal spending at $886 billion for defense and $704 billion for non-defense during the fiscal year slated to begin Oct. 1. The following year, fiscal 2025, it would cap defense spending at $895 billion for defense and $711 billion for non-defense.
In a statement released ahead of the vote, Lee said she was voting against the bill because it would “[make] it even harder for many of my constituents to access food and housing assistance they need to survive.”
Lee said she was voting against “rewarding those who took our Medicare and Social Security hostage to make it easier for their billionaire donors to cheat on their taxes,” and voting “‘NO’ to destroying the environmental safeguards that are so vital to achieving clean air and clean water in the Mon Valley. And ‘NO’ to allowing them to take our economy hostage time and time again.”
On Twitter, Perry, the other ‘no’ vote from the Keystone State, accused Biden of “happily sending Americans over yet another fiscal cliff, with far too many swampy Republicans behind the wheel of a ‘deal’ that fails miserably to address the real reason for our debt crisis: SPENDING.”
A firm NO on the “deal” vote tonight. President Biden is happily sending Americans over yet another fiscal cliff, with far too many swampy Republicans behind the wheel of a “deal” that fails miserably to address the real reason for our debt crisis: SPENDING.
— RepScottPerry (@RepScottPerry) May 31, 2023
In a statement, U.S. Rep. Susan Wild, D-7th District, a ‘yes’ vote, said a “default would have been catastrophic for everyone in our community, for the United States economy, and for the global economy.
“No compromise will ever be perfect, but this is a workable agreement to keep our economy functioning,” Wild said. “I believe my job as your Congresswoman requires compromise on important issues – and preventing the economic disaster that would ensue should America default is perhaps the most important issue I can think of.”
U.S. Rep. John Joyce, R-13th District, said passage of the bill “is the first step towards addressing Washington’s dangerous spending problem and setting us on a corrective, conservative course that pays our bills, curbs inflation, and secures the financial future of our children and grandchildren – all without defaulting on our debt, without new taxes, and without cutting Social Security, Medicare, or Veterans’ health benefits.”
U.S. Rep. Chris Deluzio, D-17th District, a veteran, repeated Democratic criticisms that Republicans were using veterans as political pawns as they sought spending cuts.
“Time and time again throughout this process, Republicans attempted to use my fellow veterans as a bargaining chip to advance their radical right-wing agenda,” Deluzio said in a statement.
“Thankfully, the pressure from President [Joe] Biden, House Democrats, and veterans’ advocates to protect the VA and to stop Republican efforts to underfund the PACT Act’s Cost of War Toxic Exposures Fund worked. In the end, we protected veterans from the worst of the Republican-proposed attacks—and the American people saw plainly that extremist Republicans are more than willing to play politics with veterans’ health care,” Deluzio said.
On Twitter, U.S. Rep. Dwight Evans, D-3rd District, said he voted in favor of the bill to “prevent a U.S. default and prevent a 2008-like economic crash and recession – and for protecting the vast majority of the progress we made in the first two years of the Biden-Harris administration.”
I’ll be voting for a bipartisan budget agreement to prevent a U.S. default and prevent a 2008-like economic crash and recession – and for protecting the vast majority of the progress we made in the first two years of the Biden-Harris administration:https://t.co/7YLCmcrU1o
— Congressman Dwight Evans (@RepDwightEvans) May 31, 2023
U.S. Rep. Mike Kelly, D-16th District, called the bill “a win for the American people and families in Western Pennsylvania.
“This bill will continue to pay the bills of America while also defunding IRS agents, enabling American energy, and cutting inflationary Progressive spending,” Kelly said in a statement.
In a statement ahead of the vote, U.S. Rep. Madeleine Dean, D-4th District, said she was voting for the bill because “it includes an agreement that suspends the debt limit through January 2025, so these hostage-taking tactics cannot be used again in our 118th Congress. The months we have spent dealing with this manufactured debt ceiling crisis could have and should have been spent on issues far more pressing to the American people.”
What else is in the bill
The 100-page bill holds numerous additional provisions, including changes to how the federal government permits energy projects as well as language to claw back $28 billion in COVID-19 funds and about $2 billion in funding for the Internal Revenue Services.
The measure would make changes to work requirements for the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office’s assessment of the legislation says the package’s provisions on discretionary spending would reduce outlays by $1.332 trillion during the next decade.
Clawing back some of the $80 billion in funding that Democrats included for the Internal Revenue Service in their signature climate change, healthcare and tax package known as the Inflation Reduction Act, or IRA, would actually increase the deficit during the next decade, according to CBO.
CBO Director Phillip Swagel wrote the cut to IRS funding would decrease spending “by $1.4 billion and decrease revenues by $2.3 billion over the 2023–2033 period, resulting in a net increase in the deficit of $900 million over that period.”
“CBO anticipates that rescinding those funds would result in fewer enforcement actions over the next decade and in a reduction in revenue collections,” Swagel wrote.
Changing some work requirements and expanding eligibility for SNAP would increase federal spending by $2.1 billion while changes to TANF would reduce it by $5 million, according to CBO.
The section of the bill that rescinds or claws back $27.1 billion in COVID-19 budget authority would reduce federal spending outlays by $11 billion during the 10-year budget window, according to CBO.
The majority of those funds, CBO said, “would come from the Public Health and Social Service Emergency Fund and from certain infrastructure and disaster relief programs.”
The Congressional Research Service explains that budget authority “allows federal agencies to incur obligations, such as entering into contracts, employing personnel, and submitting purchase orders” while outlays “represent the actual payment of these obligations, usually in the form of electronic transfers or checks issued by the Treasury Department.”
Overall, CBO said, the debt limit package would reduce the deficit by $1.5 trillion during the next decade.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, said Wednesday morning that senators should prepare to vote quickly on the package after it arrives from the House.
“I cannot stress enough that we have no margin for error,” Schumer said. “Either we proceed quickly and send this bipartisan agreement to the president’s desk, or the federal government will default for the first time ever.”
Schumer indicated during an afternoon press conference he might not allow amendment votes that some Republicans have been calling for in order to allow the bill to move quickly to final passage.
“We can’t send anything back to the House. That would risk default,” Schumer said.
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen warned last week that the country could begin a default on June 5 without a new debt limit law.
A default would have prevented the federal government from borrowing any more money to pay all of the country’s bills in full and on time. That would have meant delayed payments for hundreds of federal programs, including military paychecks, Social Security and Medicare. It also would have negatively impacted the global economy.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, said once the debt limit package reaches that chamber, he’ll “be proud to support it without delay.”
McConnell, however, expressed disappointment with the caps on defense spending, saying it was the “worst part of the deal.”
“I don’t think it’s as good as I would like,” McConnell said. “But if you look at the totality of the agreement, I think, it should be supported and our defense needs will still be there.”
McConnell said his hope is that if senators who want amendment votes are given those votes, they would yield back time, allowing the chamber to vote on final passage Thursday or Friday.
After that vote, the package will go to President Joe Biden for his signature.