U.S. House approves $4.5B border aid package that Pa. Republicans believe is ‘insufficient’

WASHINGTON — The U.S. House passed a $4.5 billion package late Tuesday to spend on humanitarian aid at the U.S.-Mexico border. 

The bill passed by a vote of 230-195, largely along party lines. The measure lays out new health and safety conditions for children kept in federal custody and additional mechanisms for Congress to oversee the detention operations. 

House Democrats pushed the legislation amid reports of severe overcrowding and a failure to provide immigrants with basic necessities at detention centers along the southern U.S. border, while stressing that the aid would not go toward assisting President Trump’s immigration policies. 

Innocent children are being neglected and deprived of basic human rights. Today, @HouseDemocrats will vote to address this crisis with:

$2.9 billion ➡️ Refugee and entrant assistance
$1.49 billion ➡️ Border protection
$170 million ➡️ Immigration logistics#KeepFamiliesTogether pic.twitter.com/KrNJQgaK0I

— Congresswoman Madeleine Dean (@RepDean) June 25, 2019

“The President’s failed policies have exacerbated the situation at the border, where vulnerable children endure inhumane conditions that threaten their health, well-being and sometimes, tragically, their lives,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said this week. 

“This legislation provides urgently-needed humanitarian assistance for families, including funding for food, shelter, clothing, medical care and legal assistance, and will relieve the horrific situation of over-crowding and help prevent additional deaths. And we are providing urgent assistance to local communities to help defray their costs of providing humanitarian assistance to asylum seekers.”

But the White House and many Republicans oppose the Democrats’ measure, setting the stage for tense negotiations in the coming days as Congress prepares to leave town for the Fourth of July recess. 

U.S. Rep. John Joyce, a Republican from central Pennsylvania’s 13th District, wrote on Twitter that the funding measure was “insufficient and does not give our law enforcement the proper resources they need to succeed.”

Had a great discussion today with @morganwrightTV about why the border funding measure we are set to vote on tonight in the House is insufficient and does not give our law enforcement the proper resources they need to succeed. pic.twitter.com/a4dmuOzZaL

— John Joyce (@RepJohnJoyce) June 25, 2019

The Trump administration requested $4.5 billion in emergency border funding last month as officials from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services warned that the agency could run out of funds to care for unaccompanied migrant children in June.

U.S. Rep. Mike Kelly, R-16th District, said that until Pelosi and her fellow Democrats “[believe that] a solution to the border crisis is more important than political points, Americans and migrants will continue to suffer.”

Kelly said Tuesday that he was looking for a bill that “addresses humanitarian and security issues,” that also gives the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security “what they need.”

Until @SpeakerPelosi believes a solution to the border crisis is more important than political points, Americans and migrants will continue to suffer. Let’s pass a bill that addresses humanitarian AND security issues, & give @DHSgov & @TheJusticeDept what they need!

— Rep. Mike Kelly (@MikeKellyPA) June 26, 2019

The Senate is expected to take up its own version of the aid bill this week. A Senate committee voted last week to approve its own bipartisan version of the bill. 

Notably, the Washington Post reported, the Senate legislation doesn’t contain all of the House Democrats’ stipulations aimed at ensuring the humane treatment of children in U.S. custody. The Senate bill includes $50 million more than the House version for immigration judges to speed up adjudication of asylum claims, and $61 million in back pay for Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents.  

Three House Republicans sided with Democrats to back the measure: Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania; Will Hurd of Texas; and Chris Smith of New Jersey. 

Four progressive freshmen Democrats voted against the House legislation: Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York; Ilhan Omar of Minnesota; Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts; and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan. 

Ocasio-Cortez said earlier this week she was opposed to providing billions of dollars in funding to detain unaccompanied migrant children.

Referring to reports about the appalling conditions at the facilities, she told the Washington Post, “That’s not due to a lack of resources; that’s due to a desire — an active desire by this administration to hurt kids,” she said. “We need to stop funding the detention of children under any and all circumstances.”