The Mueller Report: Republicans want to move on, but Pa. Dems aren’t even close to done
Then-U.S. Attorney General William Barr at the Justice Department, discussing the redacted version of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report on Russian interference in the 2016 election (screen capture)
WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans and the Trump administration want to move on from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation, now that a redacted version of the report has been released to the public.
But Democrats are just getting started.
President Trump’s Attorney General William Barr offered a robust defense of President Donald Trump onThursday morning ahead of the highly anticipated public release of the 448-page redacted report detailing the findings of Mueller’s investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Republican lawmakers were quick to call for Congress to drop the matter.
While he hadn’t yet had the chance to review the full document, “all Americans should be pleased that the Special Counsel concluded there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia,” U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., said.
Toomey added that he was glad the report “does not have any redactions based on executive privilege and that a version of the report with all redactions removed, except those relating to grand jury information, will be made available to a bipartisan group of lawmakers. I appreciate Attorney General Barr agreeing to testify before Congress in public next month to discuss the report.
“The Special Counsel’s findings are a stark reminder that Russia’s goal is to undermine the trust the American people have in our democratic process and government,” he said.
But the fight over the report and its findings is nowhere near over, as Democrats continue to question the attorney general’s motives and demand more scrutiny of Trump’s behavior and the report’s findings. Top Democrats in both the House and Senate accuse the administration of spinning the findings ahead of the reports release, and they’re calling for Mueller to testify before Congress as soon as possible.
On Twitter, U.S. Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa., said he planned to press Barr to release the grand jury material in the report — something Barr has said repeatedly that he has no plans to do.
“While examining the Mueller report and the underlying evidence will be vital, it will not change what we already know: Russia attacked our election in 2016, President Trump and his closest aides and allies welcomed that attack,” Casey said, in part.
Barr spoke to reporters Thursday at the Justice Department, where he defended Trump’s motives and reiterated findings of “no collusion” between Trump’s campaign and Russians interfering in the election.
The bottom line, Barr said, is: “After nearly two years of investigation, thousands of subpoenas, hundreds of warrants and witness interviews, the special counsel confirmed that the Russian government sponsored efforts to illegally interfere with the 2016 presidential election, but did not find that the Trump campaign or other Americans colluded in those efforts.”
The attorney general noted that Mueller’s report “recounts 10 episodes involving the president and discusses potential legal theories for connecting those activities to the elements of an obstruction offense.”
According to Barr’s four-page summary of the report released in March, Mueller declined to draw a conclusion on whether the president obstructed justice, saying that while his report “does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
Barr said Thursday that he and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein “concluded that the evidence developed by the special counsel is not sufficient to establish that the president committed an obstruction of justice offense.” Barr added that he and Rosenstein “disagreed with some of the special counsel’s legal theories and felt that some of the episodes examined did not amount to obstruction as a matter of law.”
The attorney general went on to defend Trump’s behavior, given the “unprecedented situation” he faced when he took office, citing scrutiny of his conduct by federal prosecutors and “relentless speculation in the news media” about Trump’s culpability.
Barr said that Trump, despite his frustrations and anger, “took no act that in fact deprived the special counsel of the documents and witnesses necessary to complete his investigation.”
But Trump’s critics, including congressional Democrats, aren’t satisfied.
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y. sent a letter to Mueller just after Barr’s press conference concluded, asking him to testify.
“It is clear Congress and the American people must hear from Special Counsel Robert Mueller in person to better understand his findings,” Nadler wrote on Twitter. He wants Mueller to appear before his committee “as soon as possible.”
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) also released a joint statement Thursday calling for Mueller to testify in both chambers of Congress.
“Attorney General Barr’s regrettably partisan handling of the Mueller report, including his slanted March 24th summary letter, his irresponsible testimony before Congress last week, and his indefensible plan to spin the report in a press conference later this morning — hours before he allows the public or Congress to see it — have resulted in a crisis of confidence in his independence and impartiality,” they wrote.
“We believe the only way to begin restoring public trust in the handling of the Special Counsel’s investigation is for Special Counsel Mueller himself to provide public testimony in the House and Senate as soon as possible.”
U.S. Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon, D-5th District, who sits on the Judiciary Committee, wrote on Twitter that “Like many of you, I am also eager to read the full #MuellerReport and am frustrated by this administration’s calculated effort to hide its contents. But, this is only one of the many challenges we are faced with addressing in Congress.”
Barr told reporters during the news conference he had no objection to Mueller testifying about his investigation to Congress.
Maryland Democratic Sen. Chris Van Hollen wrote on Facebook, “That was quite a spin job from Attorney General Barr on a report he has allowed no one but the White House to read so far. Just like when I questioned him under oath, he wanted to make it clear that he believes President Trump wasn’t guilty of obstruction of justice — but refuses to give us the facts to back that up.” He also urged Mueller to testify before Congress “without delay.”
Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site.