‘We can’t afford to wait,’ Wolf, lawmakers say as Pa. rolls out its plan to fight climate change

Pa. Gov. Tom Wolf (center) at a Capitol news conference announcing the state's entry into the bipartisan U.S. Climate Alliance (Capital-Star photo by John L. Micek)

Frustrated by a lack of action from the Trump administration, Gov. Tom Wolf said Monday that Pennsylvania will join a bipartisan coalition of 24 American governors who are taking it on themselves to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to uphold the principles of the scuppered Paris climate accords.

“With the federal government turning its back on science and the environment, I am proud to join with states that are leading the way towards new climate solutions, and taking concrete actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions,” Wolf said during a Capitol news conference, as he announced Pennsylvania’s entrance into the U.S. Climate Alliance. “States like Pennsylvania must take action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and protect our communities, economies, infrastructures, and environments from the risks of a warming climate.”

Surrounded by Democratic allies in the state House and Senate, Wolf also rolled out a 100-point “Climate Action Plan,” that calls on elected leaders, businesses, and private citizens to come together to help reduce greenhouse emissions. By following just 15 of those recommendations, such as using renewable energy, Pennsylvania could reduce its greenhouse emissions by 21 percent by 2025, Wolf said.

“We know our planet is becoming warmer and we know we need to change course before it is too late,” Wolf said of addressing climate changes that have seen the state experience warmer temperatures and increased incidents of extreme weather. ” … This is a sobering reality and one that I take seriously.”

Legislative Democrats echoed Wolf’s sentiment, castigating the Trump White House for its foot-dragging on environmental issues and the administration’s decision to take the United States out of the Paris agreement. At a rally in Green Bay, Wisc. on Saturday, Trump stood by the decision, asking the crowd, “How’s Paris doing?” though it was not clear what he was referring to or what he meant.

On Monday, state Senate Minority Leader Jay Costa, D-Allegheny, said the state “can’t wait for Washington to take action” on climate change. “It’s important for us to step up and take action.” A bill now before the state Senate modernizing the state’s Alternative Energy Portfolio for the first time since 2004 was a step in the right direction, Costa added.

“It’s important for us to step up and take action,” he said.

Wolf’s announcement Monday comes three months after the Democratic governor signed an executive order aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 26 percent by 2025 and by 85 percent by 2050. The order also set up a “Green Government Council” ensuring that state agencies take steps to reduce their own greenhouse gas footprint.

Wolf’s announcement also comes amid stepped up efforts by some legislative Republicans to highlight the views of climate change skeptics. Last month, a state House panel heard from one such skeptic, geologist Gregory Wrightstone, of Pittsburgh. A Republican state Senate panel is scheduled to hold its own hearing on climate change on Wednesday.

Environmental activists, who have questioned the state’s commitment to reducing methane emissions and fighting climate change, heaped praise on Wolf.

Andrew Williams, a lobbyist for the Environmental Defense Fund, called Monday’s announcement an “opportunity to take meaningful climate action while protecting Pennsylvania communities and preserving a healthy economy.”

By joining the coalition, Wolf is “assuming the mantle of leadership to fight climate change and ensure Pennsylvania is part of the solution,” Mark Szybist, a senior attorney at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said in a statement. “We look forward to strong actions from the executive branch and our leaders in the Pennsylvania General Assembly to scale-up clean energy, establish an enforceable, declining limit on carbon pollution and put people to work while building a clean energy future that benefits all Pennsylvanians.”

Wolf’s action Monday also comes amid a broader debate on whether lawmakers should authorize a $500 million bailout, funded on the backs of ratepayers, for some ailing Pennsylvania nuclear power plants, including the Three Mile Island plant just outside Harrisburg.

Environmental activists have said that alternative forms of energy, such as wind and solar, should be given consideration during any debate. Asked Monday if he supported the legislation, Wolf demurred, saying only that he’s part of a “very robust conversation,” on the state’s “alternative energy future.”

An award-winning political journalist with more than 25 years' experience in the news business, John L. Micek is The Pennsylvania Capital-Star's Editor-in-Chief. Before joining The Capital-Star, Micek spent six years as Opinion Editor at PennLive/The Patriot-News in Harrisburg, Pa., where he helped shape and lead a multiple-award-winning Opinion section for one of Pennsylvania's most-visited news websites. Prior to that, he spent 13 years covering Pennsylvania government and politics for The Morning Call of Allentown, Pa. His career has also included stints covering Congress, Chicago City Hall and more municipal meetings than he could ever count, Micek contributes regular analysis and commentary to a host of broadcast outlets, including CTV-News in Canada and talkRadio in London, U.K., as well as "Face the State" on CBS-21 in Harrisburg, Pa.; "Pennsylvania Newsmakers" on WGAL-8 in Lancaster, Pa., and the Pennsylvania Cable Network. His weekly column on American politics is syndicated nationwide to more than 800 newspapers by Cagle Syndicate.

6 COMMENTS

  1. Methane is 83x a potent greenhouse gas than CO2, and the leakage rate makes it as bad as coal, yet you continue to permit pipelines and gas powered plants that will depend on fracking for the next 50-60 years. Dr. Terry Engelder, the Penn State geologist that calculated the amount of gas in the Marcellus Shale, thus creating the boom, stated 13 years ago that if we are still burning fossil fuels in 40 years, we’re in big trouble (End of Country, Seamus McGraw). It appears that you are ignoring the elephant in the room.

  2. There is a way to get to zero CO2 for buildings and transit, including airplanes, boats, trains, cars, and trucks, but it cannot be done with electrics. The future is flying, not roads. With my engine, solar thermal and NH3 or Jet fuel maker (like the Navy is doing), all fuels can be made with electricity via solar and stored in common propane tanks. Li-ion costs 1600 times MORE than a propane tank for liquid fuel. No CO2 in NH3. My engine is the first that can run on 5 fossil fuels and electro-fuels such as NH3 and C10 synthetic Jet fuel. No NOx. No emissions. It can also run on battery for short duration if needed (1-2 miles) with an optional battery if needed. The grid must get the wind/solar Off the grid and stand alone making fuels only. Nuclear (Thorium) then is the base load. 2 cent/kwh production, 4-5 industrial, 7-8 c/kwh residential. Fuels cost less than $1/gallon equivalent to gasoline. Oil can still be used in transition and gas stations just add in NH3 or syn Jet fuel (Diesel trucks can use it). Understand? It can’t be done with what these 24 Governors think will work. Any electricity over 8 c/kwh should be refunded to rate payers with interest.

  3. Unless China and India get on board this is a total waste of time. We lead the world and Have lead the world for decades in the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. The left has nothing else to use as policy.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here