Three things to know about Pa.’s latest legal cannabis proposal


Pennsylvanians over the age of 21 would be able to legally use recreational cannabis under a bill expected to be introduced soon in the Pennsylvania state Senate.

But the bill has a long way to go — and a lot of Republican opposition to overcome — before it can land on Gov. Tom Wolf’s desk.

Senators Daylin Leach, D-Montgomery, and Sen. Sharif Street, D-Philadelphia, announced the bill Monday in a memo to their colleagues, where they said that legalizing recreational cannabis would remedy the injustices of the War on Drugs and generate revenue for Pennsylvania’s communities and public schools.

“Cannabis is still widely available to purchase illegally, and yet we disproportionately arrest, prosecute, monitor, and incarcerate thousands of nonviolent Pennsylvanians who are poor and people of color,” the memo reads. “Cannabis prohibition is an immoral and expensive failure of public policy.”

They’ve introduced similar bills in the past with no luck. This time around, though, they’re operating in a different climate.

Wolf said last year that it was time for Pennsylvania to take a “serious look” at legalizing marijuana. The same month, public polls showed that 59 percent of Pennsylvanians support legalization — up from 22 percent in 2006.

Lt. Gov John Fetterman is currently conducting a statewide listening tour, where he’s stopping in all of Pennsylvania’s 67 counties to hear people sound off on the issue. And there’s a legalization effort underway in the House, thanks to a bill introduced by Rep. Jake Wheatly, D-Allegheny.

Street said on Monday that the lawmakers made social justice, inclusion, and economic development their priorities in crafting the new bill. Here are three things to know about it.

The program would be administered by the state’s Department of Agriculture.

Rather letting the Bureau of Drugs and Alcohol or the state Department of Revenue to administer its marijuana laws, as some other states do, the new Senate proposal would put recreational marijuana under the purview of the Department of Agriculture.

“We want to treat this as a normal agricultural product,” said Micah Mahjoubian, Street’s policy director. “This really is a unique part of the [proposed] Pennsylvania model, that we would treat it purely as an agricultural commodity.”

The state’s medical marijuana program would still be administered by the Department of Health, Mahjoubian said.

The Department of Agriculture already oversees the state’s production of hemp, a cannabis cousin that doesn’t have any psychoactive properties.

State Agriculture Secretary Russell Redding announced in January that the state had submitted a plan for full commercial production of industrial hemp to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The updated federal Farm Bill, signed into law by President Donald Trump in December, opened the doors to hemp production by removing the plant from the federal Controlled Substances list.

It would create low barriers of entry into the cannabis biz

One goal of the Senate bill is to create an inclusive cannabis industry, Mahjoubian said. That means making it easy for anyone to grow cannabis for personal use or get involved in commercial production and distribution.

The proposal would allow anyone over the age of 21 obtain a permit to grow up to six cannabis plants in their homes for personal use. It would also let permitted “micro-growers” sell home-grown cannabis to processors and dispensaries.

The bill also proposes one key difference from the state’s medical marijuana program, which currently distributes a set number of permits to growers, processors, and dispensaries. That process is fiercely competitive (and, some argue, not transparent) and caps the number of marijuana-related businesses that can operate in the state.

The recreational program Street and Leach are proposing wouldn’t cap the number of permits for recreational marijuana growers, processors and businesses. Growers would have to comply with increasingly strict regulations as their production increases, but there’s no limit to how many qualified establishments could apply to enter the cannabis industry

Their bill would also create permits for a new type of marijuana enterprise: a “public consumption lounge,” which is the only place in public where marijuana can be consumed. (Think of it as a bar for marijuana users.)

There are only nine such marijuana lounges in the U.S., according to the cannabis industry news site Leafly. Seven are in San Francisco; Oakland, California and Denver, Colorado have one each.

Proceeds from marijuana sales would be distributed to schools and criminal justice initiatives

Street estimates that the annual revenue from the program would be close to $600. (The state’s Auditor General put the figure at $581 million in an analysis last year.)

That figure reflects tax revenue, minus the cost of the program’s administration, and doesn’t include potential savings from lower prosecution and incarceration of marijuana users, Street said.

The bulk of the tax revenue would come from an excise tax. Mahjoubian said the tax rate “still has to be worked out,” but would be less than 25 percent.

Street and Leach want to direct the revenue back to schools. Their proposal calls for the proceeds of the program to be funneled through the state’s fair funding formula, which would particularly benefit rapidly growing suburban districts and urban districts that have been traditionally underfunded, Street said.

Street said districts could use the new revenue to provide property tax relief to their residents.

Street also anticipates that the proposal will save money in Pennsylvania’s courts and corrections systems. Those savings would be directed back to communities as part of the state’s Justice Reinvestment Initiative — an ongoing effort to take savings generated by criminal justice reforms and use them to fund addiction treatment and other non-penal public safety programs.


  1. Americans don’t have to like cannabis, but they should hate its prohibition. This prohibition law strikes at the very foundation of our society. It is a tool of tyrants, used to violate core American beliefs and nearly every aspect of the Bill of Rights.

    A populace that accepts and becomes accustom to overreaching government policies, such as the prohibition of relatively safe, popular substances, becomes more accepting of overreaching, powerful government in general. This devastates America, not a plant that has been used by mankind since the beginning of recorded history.

    Those who believe in limited government, personal responsibility, free markets, and individual liberty should embrace the ending of this irrational, un-American, fraudulently enacted cannabis prohibition. It should be the cornerstone of current GOP policy.

    Federal studies show about half of the U.S. population has tried cannabis, at least 15% use it regularly, over 80% of high school seniors have reported cannabis “easy to get” for decades. This prohibition, like alcohol prohibition has had little of its intended effect. In many cases cannabis prohibition makes cannabis usage problematic where it would not have been otherwise, be it light, moderate, or heavy usage. For the most part, cannabis prohibition only successfully prohibits effective regulation.

    A few issues created by prohibition: there are no quality controls to reduce contaminants (harmful pesticides, molds, fungus, other drugs), there is no practical way to prevent regular underage sales, billions in tax revenue are lost which can be used for all substance abuse treatment, underground markets for all drugs are empowered as a far more popular substance is placed within them expanding their reach and increasing their profits, criminal records make pursuing many decent careers difficult, police and court resources are unnecessarily tied up by pursuing and prosecuting victimless ‘crimes’, public mistrust and disrespect for our legal system, police, and government is increased, which is devastating our country.

    Prohibition is also very expensive, though, a cash cow for a number of powerful groups such as those related to law enforcement and the prison industry. These organizations have powerful lobbies and influence that perpetuate a failed drug policy through ignorance, fear, disinformation and misinformation. This ensures an endless supply of lucrative contracts, grants and subsidies from the government and its taxpayers to support their salaries, tools of the trade, ‘correctional’ services, and other expenses. Cash, property and other assets from civil forfeiture laws also significantly fatten their coffers while often violating civil rights.

    America was built on the principles of freedom and liberty. In some cases there are extreme circumstances that warrant intervention with criminal law. In the case of mind-altering drugs we have already set this precedent with alcohol. Cannabis is less harmful than alcohol to the consumer and especially to others. If we are to have justice, then the penalties for using, possessing and selling cannabis should be no worse than those of alcohol.

    Let’s end this costly, futile attempt to eradicate a plant that a majority of Americans believe should be legal. A vote to end cannabis prohibition is a vote to condemn a prohibition that causes more harm than it prevents.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.