The choice to legalize recreational cannabis isn’t as easy as proponents say it is | Opinion

The expectation that adults would legally use marijuana, while children would not, is clearly misguided

Sen. Mike Regan, R-York, speaks during a Senate Law and Justice Committee hearing on legalizing adult-use cannabis on Monday, Feb. 28, 2022. (Screenshot)

By Thomas C. Gross

As he’s pursued the legalization of recreational adult-use cannabis, state Senate Law & Justice Committee Chairperson Mike Regan, R-York, has said he believes a new policy would provide safety, age control, and revenues. He has described this as a simple choice. As I have found in my 45 years of law enforcement, the choice is not so simple.

While many states have legalized marijuana use, this decision must be viewed in light of the benefits and the risks.

The expectation of safety, control, and revenues has not been realized in those states and we should expect no better. The expectation that adults would legally use marijuana, while children would not, is clearly misguided.

Cannabis Legalization: Pa. should lead, not follow | Opinion

We know that children are using marijuana at a dangerous rate in legalized environments. This use is more difficult to prevent and detect. There is increased use of easily obtained legal marijuana, as well as horrifying accounts of the effects of increased use and extremely potent forms of this substance. These consequences have been well documented and need to be fully reviewed during any legalization process.

In a series of hearings, Regan’s committee heard testimony from many who stand to benefit financially from legalized marijuana. It is clear that big corporations stand to make big profits and exert profound influence. The Senator himself points out that there is a choice between billions in illegal sales or tax revenues. Again, those states where sales have been legalized have seen increases in illicit sales as well as diversion and regulatory chaos.

Senate committee considers oversight, economic growth with legalized adult-use cannabis

The criminal distribution has not stopped and arrests, and convictions as incarcerations continue.

There has been little comment regarding the effects of marijuana on violent criminal behavior and the experience that law enforcement has with exponential increases in impaired driving due to marijuana use. Enforcement of this behavior is complicated, expensive, and has not kept up with the increases in marijuana impaired accidents and fatalities occurring with legalization.

Finally, while there appears to be an increase in support for legalization of marijuana, we urge caution in considering popular support as a mandate. Regan mentions, without reference, a poll that shows 90 percent of Pennsylvanians agree with marijuana legalization, regulation, and taxation.

Law enforcement professionals have more contact with the public than any other government employees. We have seen the effects of marijuana use and heard from our colleagues in states with legal use.

We recognize that societal change occurs, and we will always need to adapt. But we must also have an opportunity to share our experience and knowledge regarding the impact on public safety of marijuana legislation.

The effort to legalize is at significant risk of causing more harm to children, more crime, and more danger on the highways in order to provide more opportunity for more people to get more high more often.

Thomas C. Gross is the former chief of the York City Police Department. He writes on behalf of the Pennsylvania Chiefs of Police Association, a professional association based in Dauphin County.

Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.

Capital-Star Guest Contributor
Capital-Star Guest Contributor

The Pennsylvania Capital-Star welcomes opinion pieces from writers who share our goal of widening the conversation on how politics and public policy affects the day-to-day lives of people across the commonwealth.