Capitol police try to hold back rioters outside the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. (Photo by Alex Kent for the Tennessee Lookout)
By John A. Tures
A decade ago, there were more than a half-dozen Congressional committees investigating the attack upon the U.S. Consular Office in Benghazi, Libya.
Yet chances are dimming for even a single Congressional investigation of the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol itself on January 6, 2021. But Congress should not be barred from investigating an attempt to overturn the election results by force.
U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., is right; we need a second vote, free from political pressure.
As of October of 2012, there were more than seven Congressional probes of the Benghazi attack, mostly led by Republicans. These included (1) the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, (2) The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, (3) the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, (4) The House Committee on Foreign Affairs, (5) The House Committee on the Judiciary, (6) The House Committee on Armed Services, and (7) The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. There’s also (8) The House Select Committee on Benghazi.This list does not account for non-Congressional investigations of the terror attack.
The Poynter Institute’s Politfact found this of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s view of the findings: “As for her comment that there was no overt wrongdoing, just room for improvement, that’s a rosy assessment. But it is also largely accurate.”
But the Benghazi probes had “done their job,” according to then Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif, who had this to say about all of those investigations.
“Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today?” McCarthy, now the House Minority Leader, said. “Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she’s untrustable. But no one would’ve known any of that had happened had we not fought and made that happen.”
Former U.S. Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-SC., who helped the panel, rushed to insist that these hearings unbiased, but the damage by McCarthy was done. It was a major reason why McCarthy was pushed aside as a replacement for then House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, by Republicans who selected U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan, of Wisconsin, instead.
Democrats gave in to Republican demands on membership, subpoena power, composition, and modeled the committee to investigate the attack along the lines of the 9/11 Commission.
But even this bending-over-backwards wasn’t enough to satisfy McCarthy or U.S. Senate Republican leaders, who voted down this investigation. It will be up to the Justice Department to investigate the crimes on Jan. 6, 2021, not necessarily a bipartisan affair.
For the Republican leadership, this isn’t about giving the Democrats an edge, or having their brand look terrible. Folks have already made up their minds that it was either a terrible coup attempt or simply a group of peaceful protesters calmly pleading their case in a nonviolent fashion.
And everyone’s already seen the videos of what really happened, and don’t need someone else to try and explain that they didn’t see what they did see. t’s about having to repeat, under oath, what they said to President Trump when they pleaded with him to call off the attackers.
They’ve seen what’s happened to U.S. Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., in the caucus, and how every member of Congress who voted to impeach Trump got a host of primary challengers.
And they have already faced Trump’s wrath once already, and aren’t itching to make him angry again, especially given that he has a chance to win another term, and exact his revenge upon all who ever stood up to him, or even disagreed with him, or didn’t loudly defend him.
Opinion Contributor John A. Tures is a professor of political science at LaGrange College in LaGrange, Ga. His work appears frequently on the Capital-Star’s Commentary Page. Readers may email him at [email protected], and follow him on Twitter at @JohnTures2.
Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.