Latino community urges reopening of Pittsburgh’s immigration court

Many families who need to go to immigration court must now travel to Philadelphia or find a virtual alternative

By: - June 10, 2022 3:24 pm

(Adobe Stock/The Philadelphia Gay News).

By Ladimir Garcia

PITTSBURGH — Protesters advocating for the reopening of Pittsburgh’s immigration court rallied Friday, stating that its closing has placed a burden on the city’s Latino community.

The protest, hosted by Latino resource and welcome center Casa San Jose, was held in front of the former location of the Pittsburgh immigration court and the current ICE headquarters on the city’s South Side.

“This is very important to Casa San Jose because most of the community that we serve has immigration court in Pittsburgh,” Laura Perkins, Casa San Jose’s emergency response organizer, said.

“And so that means that now our community members either have to travel all the way to Philadelphia to attend their immigration courts, or they have to try to navigate a system that even the immigration courts have not acknowledged is not a good system,” Perkins said.

On April 21, the Executive Office for Immigration Review released a notice with the title, “EOIR to stop holding hearings in Pittsburgh on Sidney Street,” which announced the closing of its hearing location in Pittsburgh, the only one within the region besides Philadelphia.

The court officially closed on April 29.

According to the same notice, the court was closed due to “space and personnel limitations.” EOIR said in the notice that it was “committed to continuing to serve Pittsburgh-area respondents and their representatives through the Philadelphia Immigration Court’s operations.” But Perkins believes that there are easier solutions that don’t include closing the court.

The immigration court served the Greater Pittsburgh Area, but it also provided services to all of West Virginia. With the court closing, many families who need to go to immigration court must now travel to Philadelphia or find a virtual alternative.

U.S. Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa., and U.S. Reps. Mike Doyle, D-18th District, and Conor Lamb, D-17th District, sent a letter to Chief Immigration Judge, Tracy Short, in which they outlined the importance of keeping the immigration court in Pittsburgh.

“With the closure of the Sidney Street facility, those without adequate access to stable internet or the resources to afford it, would likely be forced to travel to Philadelphia,” Casey, Doyle, and Lamb wrote, adding that “placing additional burden on the respondents and their attorneys, particularly, for respondents and their attorneys who had to travel the day before for early hearings, which costs additional time and money.”

In the notice provided by the EOIR, those who have a hearing in Philadelphia will have the option to have their cases heard remotely from their homes or offices, but Casa San Jose and the representatives agree that is not sufficient action.

“Considering the disproportionate gap in connectivity for immigrant households, coupled with Pennsylvania’s overall challenges in accessing broadband, access to stable, affordable high-speed internet is a challenge for many of our constituents,” the lawmakers wrote.

Casa San Jose, a local resource center for Latino immigrants, also highlighted the burden that traveling to Philadelphia would impose on those in the Latino community.

“We believe many of our Latino community members do not have the financial capacity to pay the additional costs of driving or taking public transit to this city. Furthermore, they cannot afford to stay overnight in Philadelphia and miss an extra day of work,” the organization said in a statement.

According to Casey, Doyle, and Lamb, EOIR knew of the potential closure of the court in December 2021 and was notified there would be a 45-day extension for the court to operate on March 15, 2022.

Ladimir Garcia is a reporter for Pittsburgh City Paper, where this story first appeared.

Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.